Question Why do people say that the KDE's user interface is less consistent than GNOME?
NOTE: I'm strictly talking about stock GNOME and stock KDE.
As someone who has tried GNOME and KDE both, I don't really understand what people on reddit mean when they say "GNOME has a more consistent user interface" or "GNOME is more polished". Don't get me wrong, this is absolutely not a hate post on GNOME. I have been a GNOME user for a very long time (still use it on my laptop), I'm mentioning this so that it that gives me some credibility to say what I'm about to say. Almost all posts fail to point out concrete example(s) as to why they think GNOME's UI is more consistent than KDE.
Is simplicity being equated with consistency here?
If not, then I don't really think GNOME and adwaita applications are as consistent as KDE applications.
Most KDE applications tend to have the same the decoration, whereas a lot of GNOME applications are yet to be ported to the GTK-4 libadwaita design (take gnome-boxes for instance). On stock KDE, I have yet to see an application that doesn't naturally fit into the aesthetics of the system. For me, UI consistency is just "having the same aesthetics and experience everywhere", then wouldn't KDE and its ecosystem be more consistent then GNOME's ecosystem?
I did feel like KDE's applications are a bit cluttered at first because of the amount of options available to me and the fact that I'm used to the simplicity of GNOME (I call it simple because it intentionally exposes fewer options to the user and implements limited features in its core applications). However, I don't really think having a lot of settings that the user can change and is natively exposed by the desktop environment makes it any less inconsistent or consistent. I have been overwhelmed by the extent of configurability, sure, but I haven't experienced any noticeable inconsistency on KDE.
What am I missing?
Is my definition of consistency incomplete?
Even libreoffice (which looks quite dreadful in GNOME) looks quite polished on KDE.
GNOME's core applications are highly polished and consistent with the new design but I have noticed more inconsistencies on GNOME than I have on KDE. That's not to say either one of them is inconsistent, both of them are fairly consistent, but it's just that when people argue that GNOME's UI is more consistent than KDE, I don't really understand how or why they think that.
I would like to hear if you have encountered anything that you would consider to be inconsistent on KDE when compared to your experience in GNOME.
No AI was used in the making of this post! (if that matters)




