Our ancestors used to speak of stories with morals to them.

While many of us got the morals, it seems our public servants seemed to miss them, or actively did the bad things the morals said not to do.

This is just one instance of a past story coming to life in a way nowadays. Even when the movie came out decades ago. There are more correlative past stories that are comparable to today.

Robber-barons, the lot of them. It especially showed its face at the beginning of 2020, when politickians sold their stocks out way before we caught word of C-19.

I have used SUNO and a bunch of AI for years. Also I remember playing with the AI JP that got taken down years ago.
It feels like some of the recent podcast content of JP that is not a previous podcast or presentation sounds actually like AI Jordan Peterson.

Am I the only one who hears that? I feel like I’m taking crazy pills!

I feel like Jordan Peterson would find the charismatic renewal in the Protestant and Catholic Church interesting because they talk about hearing Gods voice feeling his presence and having divine mystical encounters with the Holy Spirit instead of just following dogmatic religion.

I also don’t know if JP has had a mystical experience with Jesus but I feel if he did it would be good for him as it would change him from being just a intellectual into a mystic

What do you guys think

Any life lessons or moments from one of his videos or podcast appearances?

Hi, Im interested in doing the self authoring programme.
Is the full suite here: https://www.scribd.com/document/898501545/Self-Authoring-Jordan-B-Peterson-Complete-Self-Authoring-Suite-Past-Present-Faults
If anyone has done it please tell me. Thanks

I’ve noticed on reddit mainly, people hate Jordan Peterson I myself agree with most of what he says. And have found his lectures on the Old Testament really interesting. I’m from Australia and most Australians seem to lean more left for some reason.

If anyone can explain why this is would be a great help thank you

I recently read through Jordan Peterson’s entire 200 page PhD thesis and made a video breaking it down on YouTube. I enjoyed reading his thesis a lot and seeing the kind of genuine academic work he was putting forward way back before he ever knew how successful he would be. The thesis is essentially about studying sons of male alcoholics (SOMAs), who seem to be predisposed to alcoholism, and testing them to see how alcohol might affect them differently psychologically, in order to find potential markers that could reliably detect a predisposition to alcoholism in a general population. I thought it was super interesting and think maybe the fine people of this subreddit will think so too.

The biological father Gerald Stearn of Amy Acton reported the sexual and physical abuse of his daughter and son to the authorities. This reporting allowed charges to brought against Cledith Arthur. Arthur was indicted and was to be tried for this crime. Amy’s mother in 1978 lost custody of her kids as a result of the indictments.

Amy and her brother’s father Gerald took custody of his kids. These kids grew up in a stable and healthy home and both of them thrived and achieved great success in their lives.

My question is simple why did the biological mother get automatic custody of the kids?

Why not start to give fathers an equal opportunity to prove they can raise their own kids in a healthy and loving environment?

Why are fathers given custody only in horrendous situations like this? The biological mother has been proven to be utterly detestable based upon her Ramaswamy ad.

The father’s advocacy for his kids saved their lives. The abuse would have continued had the father not brought charges against the step father.

The biological mother did nothing to protect her kids instead she abandoned her children and stood by a pedophile who raped her daughter from age 9 to 12.