r/HomeNAS • u/Dudarude00 • 3h ago
Open question DIY NAS vs. ASUSTOR Lockerstor 6 Gen2 — reliability or value for a home server?
I'm trying to decide whether to invest in a proper six-bay NAS or build one myself from older workstation hardware. I'd appreciate honest opinions from people with real-world experience using both approaches.
- My current setup
I have two QNAP TS-231P NAS units, both running RAID 1:
One with approximately 8 TB of storage.
One with approximately 12 TB of storage.
They provide central storage for photos, videos, music, documents, and other files, as well as network file access and backups.
Unfortunately, the QNAPs are increasingly struggling with their workload. I've experienced software instability, limited resources for services such as Immich and internal media streaming, slow startup with the larger hard drives, and painfully slow file indexing.
I'm now looking for a substantial improvement in performance, reliability, and long-term expandability.
- My existing network architecture
I already have a separate Proxmox VE server running my applications and services in containers.
One example is Immich, which accesses photo files stored on the NAS. The idea is to keep the application and its database on the Proxmox server while storing the actual photo collection on central network storage.
The NAS is therefore primarily intended to provide reliable storage over SMB and, where useful, other standard network file protocols.
My main use cases are:
Central storage for photos and videos.
Photo management through Immich, running on Proxmox.
Internal media streaming.
Shared storage for music, documents, and other files.
Client backup storage and file synchronization.
Access to and management of large file collections from Windows PCs.
For client data, I use Veeam Agent for image-level backups and SMB-based file synchronization for selected files and folders.
My phone photos are also synchronized over Wi-Fi to network storage using SMB-based file synchronization.
Proxmox Backup Server is a separate system and already handles my Proxmox backup requirements. I don't need the NAS to replace PBS.
This is an important distinction: I don't need Docker, virtual machines, or another application server on the NAS. Proxmox already handles that role. I want the NAS to concentrate on storage, file services, data protection, and reliable network access.
- Option A: Buy an ASUSTOR Lockerstor 6 Gen2 (AS6706T)
This is currently my preferred turnkey solution, but it is also at the upper end of my budget.
My initial plan is to install four 12 TB Toshiba N300 drives in RAID 5, providing approximately 36 TB of usable capacity before filesystem overhead.
Two drive bays would remain available for future expansion.
What attracts me to the ASUSTOR is its six-bay design, integrated hardware and software, expansion options, and the prospect of spending less time maintaining the storage system.
I also like the possibility of using snapshots and other built-in storage management features.
Since Proxmox already runs my applications, I don't need to pay for NAS-based virtualization or container hosting. I mainly want a reliable storage platform with good SMB performance, responsive file access, and sensible data protection features.
The downside is the initial investment, especially after adding the drives and potentially upgrading the RAM.
- Option B: Build a DIY NAS from used workstation hardware
I could save a substantial amount of money by repurposing older workstation hardware, for example:
HP Z420 or Z220 workstations.
Potentially an HP Z2 G4 or another suitable workstation.
Xeon E3 or E5 processors, depending on the platform.
ECC memory where supported by the motherboard and CPU.
OpenMediaVault or TrueNAS SCALE as the storage operating system.
The attraction is obvious: much lower hardware costs, flexibility, and potentially more processing power than I need for a storage-only system.
Since Proxmox handles my applications, the DIY NAS would not need to run a large collection of containers or virtual machines. It would mainly provide network shares, storage management, and data protection.
However, I've already had disappointing experiences with both OpenMediaVault and TrueNAS SCALE.
On previous occasions, an update or upgrade was followed by a RAID pool becoming unavailable. I had to resort to data recovery before I could get my data back into a working NAS.
I realize that the precise cause of such failures depends on the system and configuration, and that a RAID pool becoming unavailable does not necessarily mean the data itself has been destroyed.
Nevertheless, these experiences have made me cautious about building another storage system that might require significant hands-on troubleshooting.
I am comfortable working with hardware and maintaining my home server infrastructure. What I want to avoid is turning the NAS itself into a recurring maintenance project.
- What matters most to me
My priorities are:
Reliable storage over the long term.
Good SMB performance for Windows clients.
Responsive file indexing, browsing, and management of large collections.
Reliable access to photos and videos through Immich and other services.
Internal media streaming.
Client backups and file synchronization.
RAID, snapshots, and a practical recovery strategy.
Six drive bays and room for future expansion.
Reasonable power consumption and maintenance requirements.
I am planning for a system that should remain useful for the next 5–10 years.
I don't necessarily need the fastest hardware. I need a storage system that does its job reliably without requiring constant attention.
- What would you choose?
I'm torn between two approaches:
Option A — ASUSTOR Lockerstor 6 Gen2: A higher initial investment for a purpose-built NAS with an integrated software platform and six drive bays.
Option B — DIY NAS: A considerably cheaper system built from used workstation hardware, with more control but potentially more responsibility for compatibility, maintenance, updates, and recovery.
Given that Proxmox already handles my applications and PBS independently handles Proxmox backups, would you consider the ASUSTOR worth the premium for the storage role alone?
Or would you build a storage-only NAS from used workstation hardware and put the savings toward additional drives and backup capacity?
I'd especially appreciate feedback from people who have run either approach for several years.
How reliable have OpenMediaVault and TrueNAS SCALE been for you through major updates and upgrades?
Have you found a turnkey NAS such as the ASUSTOR noticeably easier to maintain over the long term?
For SMB file access, large photo collections, indexing, and media storage, does modern NAS hardware offer meaningful advantages over older workstation hardware?
If you were building a home NAS for the next 5–10 years, would you buy the ASUSTOR or build your own?
I'm interested in long-term reliability, recovery experiences, maintenance effort, and total cost of ownership rather than benchmark results alone.
Thanks for sharing your experiences and recommendations!